The only way I can continue to publish this newsletter and my blog for free is with the voluntarily support of those who can make little donation via my blog or are paid subscribers. Kindly help me in my efforts to help everyone on Earth.

Share

Just stumbled upon a study about quantum commuting that was published in the most prestigious science journal Nature, however it was discovered that the results were not reproducible and so on.

Frolov and Mourik found they couldn’t reproduce the Delft results. That October the duo asked Kouwenhoven’s group for their raw data, and in December they found some odd inconsistencies: It looked as though some of the plots had been manipulated, and the paper’s claims weren’t borne out when the full range of measurements was taken into account. https://www.quantamagazine.org/major-quantum-computing-strategy-suffers-serious-setbacks-20210929/?fbclid=IwAR2bVWc6uhPTGpHCkXTYaPwtXPMGLAlTleZmDSGbiNHZhJ7leGD_mEc7UBM

It was retracted with a pathetic apology by the authors, and the truth is that if Nature was trustworthy journal, it would simply not happen. It shows again why we need other types of science reporting, such as the one I suggest: Genuine Science Journal. Read or listen, and share.

genuineprospect

Genuine Science Journal – The Antidote to Scientific Fraud

Listen now (8 min) | Alzheimer's, depression research, and you know what else are just a few examples of scientific fraud. Yes, scientific findings, which justify many government policies and medical procedures, are frequently fabricated. As a result, lives are ruined, and many people are killed or damaged. All paid by our tax money. It also leads to the suppression of genu…

Read more

2 years ago · 1 like · Dr Lidiya Angelova