2 Comments
User's avatar
Markker's avatar

The fact that regulators, or more appropriately named enablers, knew already in 2019 that Pfizer's own documents stated this product was unstable and should not be injected! Link at the end. I have read much on Bailiwick News substack on how the laws in USA were made and amended, especially the PREP Act, which, in an emergency that can be called without evidence, even a potential threat, then emergency "countermeasures" can be used if they MAY be helpful, without proof of safety or efficacy. This will remain in place as long as emergency, which, in USA, was extended to 2029. There is some global agreement in place, for emergencies, that other countries would just accept the word of the country issuing countermeasures as to the product being safe and effective. They were forbidden to examine vials also. The 5/6 dose vials went against good manufacturing practice, as thawing, diluting, extracting each dose, is part of manufacturing, and critical to safety and efficiency - who actually did this? And where? The court case where the trial site manager said the trial at her site was a shambles, lost because the judge agreed Pfizer produced what US Gov asked for via Dept of Defence, not Health dept. The Dutch MP said it was all led by NATO on video. Is this why no-one can stop these because it's a global military operation to cull the herd? rumble.com/v42ykgq-reiner-fuellmich-and-dr.-gabriele-segalla-who-biontech-pfizer-and-fda-knew-.html

Expand full comment
Dr Lidiya Angelova's avatar

It's a cull. Visible for anyone who isn't brainwashed. The "kill shot camps" were everywhere: stores, restaurants, parks and even on the beach. It wasn’t a health driven operation but definitely military.

Expand full comment