How the Media Misrepresents Scientific Research
"Objective media and journalists simply do not exist in the mainstream.” ~ Robert Black. "Same with the science" ~ Dr Angelova
The mass media is designed to spread propaganda. This isn't shocking news.Sometimes they absolutely cross the line. I came across an article by Today that is a perfect example.
It has a horrifying title.
Young people are more likely to die of heart attacks post-COVID, study finds. But why?
They begin with the story of a young woman who had a heart attack in 2020, while implying that she did not have the COVID-19 vaccine at the time, but instead had COVID-19, which we now know does not exist. Because they know that more people are becoming aware of the link between so-called COVID-19 vaccines and heart disease, they allege she was not vaccinated. If there was no connection, they would not have mentioned it. It never happened with other vaccines for a reason. They go on to say that there is a 30% increase in heart attack deaths, citing a study.
“People between 25 and 44, who saw a 29.9% relative increase in heart attack deaths over the first two years of the pandemic (which means the actual number of heart attack deaths were almost 30%)”.They continue that's because of COVID-19.
What does the study's press release say? “Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Vital Statistics System, the Cedars-Sinai researchers identified 1,522,699deaths from heart attacks—medically called acute myocardial infarctions—between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2022. Investigators then compared age-related mortality rates between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, as well as demographic groups and regions.“
As you can see, the study simply counts all data from 2020 to 2022 as the same, but there was a big change in the beginning of 2021: people were injected with a gene product that causes heart disease, and the reaction is greater in the younger population because their cells can produce more of the toxic spike protein.
Later Today cite Los Angeles County paramedic Romeo Robles: "It appears to be able to increase the stickiness of the blood and increase ... the likelihood of blood clot formation," Cheng said. "It seems to stir up inflammation in the blood vessels. It seems to also cause in some people an overwhelming stress — whether it’s related directly to the infection or situations around the infection — that can also cause a spike in blood pressure."
Once again, the infection for all doctors is based on a bogus test. If you haven't already, read more about it: https://genuineprospect.com/2023/02/17/cormandrostenreview-com/
They then mention another study to make it sound even worse.
Today: “For COVID-19 survivors, the risk of developing a heart condition even a year after the infection, regardless of how severe the initial symptoms were, is "substantial," according to a February 2022 study of more than 150,000 individuals with COVID-19. The risk increases even for people who don't have any other risk factors for heart disease.”
The research is based on information gained from hospital databases between March 2020 and January 2021. COVID is only determined by testing. According to the additional information about health status, 85% of those who tested positive were overweight or obese, which is a risk factor for developing heart problems or sudden death.
This is an example of both bogus science from supposedly trustworthy scientific journals and propaganda. The studies are not conducted using the scientific method which I explain here https://genuineprospect.com/2022/03/25/what-actually-is-the-scientific-method/. It's a made-up story to fit the narrative and cover up the COVID-19 vaccine injuries. As well, Maura Hohman, the report's author, is not qualified to write such a piece. That is way too common even among so called anti-narrative activists but will be a topic of another article.
genuineprospect is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber.