cormandrostenreview.com PCR test study rebuttal has a new website
Perhaps you are aware that I was among the first to criticize the PCR test for its inaccuracies and the fact that it cannot be used to justify the presence of any pathogens. In addition to writing about it on social media and blogs, I worked with other scientists to retract the study that was the basis for the SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 PCR tests. The study has numerous flaws and was not properly peer-reviewed (aside of the fact that peer-reviewed studies have other flaws). The study was not retracted because science is corrupt to the core, but our work is used as a source of information in courts and other cases. It is a source of hope as well. Unfortunately, the website is no longer accessible, but our work is still available here:
In the link above you can flashcards with a simplified explanation of PCR and other COVID-19 tests, as well as COVID-19 data.
Please spread the word so that people can continue to use the Corman-Drosten review.
I'm working on a website that will help to bring genuine scientific research and policies back to the spotlight.
You can help to the cause by becoming a paid subscriber or donating via my blog.
genuineprospect is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.